From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Maryland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 14, 2008
300 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1802.

Submitted: October 27, 2008.

Decided: November 14, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01087-CCB).

Earl L. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Assistant Attorney General, William Ferris Brockman, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark C. Jobson, Office of the Attorney General of Washington, Olympia, Washington; Kelly Hughes Iverson, Goodell, Devries, Leech Dann, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court's order dismissing this action complaining about the termination of social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland, No. 1:08-cv-01087-CCB (D.Md. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Maryland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 14, 2008
300 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Richardson v. Maryland

Case Details

Full title:Earl L. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Great State of MARYLAND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 2008

Citations

300 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2008)