From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Keyser

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 12, 2019
178 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

529514

12-12-2019

In the Matter of Fred RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. William KEYSER, as Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Fred Richardson, Napanoch, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Fred Richardson, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Devine, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Lynch, J.P., Devine, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

AJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Keyser

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 12, 2019
178 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Richardson v. Keyser

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Fred Richardson, Petitioner, v. William Keyser, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 12, 2019

Citations

178 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 8910
111 N.Y.S.3d 913