From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 8, 2022
No. 02-21-00403-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)

Opinion

02-21-00403-CV

09-08-2022

Theda Richardson, Appellant v. Quintin Jones, Appellee


On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-004775-1

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

Appellant's brief was due July 13, 2022. On August 4, 2022, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex.R.App.P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).


Summaries of

Richardson v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 8, 2022
No. 02-21-00403-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Richardson v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:Theda Richardson, Appellant v. Quintin Jones, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Sep 8, 2022

Citations

No. 02-21-00403-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)