From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Heinochowitz

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 16, 1925
128 A. 152 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Submitted February 9, 1925 —

Decided March 16, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 2 N.J. Mis. R. 919.

For the respondent, Dalrymple Campbell.

For the appellant, Milton M. Unger.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Heinochowitz

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 16, 1925
128 A. 152 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Richardson v. Heinochowitz

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD RICHARDSON, RESPONDENT, v. JACOB HEINOCHOWITZ, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Mar 16, 1925

Citations

128 A. 152 (N.J. 1925)
128 A. 152

Citing Cases

John P. Callaghan, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.

MacWhinney v. Jacobson, 109 N.J.L. 477. If it contained any incompetent or irrelevant matter, the proper…