From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Hamrick

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 29, 2021
EDCV 21-830 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

EDCV 21-830 JGB (SHKx)

12-29-2021

Gregory Richardson v. W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.


Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (IN CHAMBERS)

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed R. Civ. Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before January 17, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed as to the applicable defendant for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by the plaintiff is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Richardson v. Hamrick

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 29, 2021
EDCV 21-830 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Richardson v. Hamrick

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Richardson v. W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

EDCV 21-830 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)