Opinion
3:23CV00119-KGB-JTK
07-11-2024
ANGELA SCHUNCEY RICHARDSON ADC # 712575 PLAINTIFF v. CHARLOTTE GARDNER, et al. DEFENDANTS
ORDER
JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
Angela Schuncey Richardson (“Plaintiff”) has filed a Motion for Order (Doc. No. 77) and a Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 80). For the reasons set out below, Plaintiff's Motion for Order (Doc. No. 77) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 80) is GRANTED.
I. Motion for Order
The Court directed the ADC Defendants to file a copy of the “pill crushing” policy, if such a policy could be identified. (Doc. No. 64). The ADC Defendants did not file any policy. The Court will take into consideration that no policy was filed. This issue is resolved for the time being. Plaintiff alleges the Medical Defendants altered certain medical documents. The Court notes Plaintiff's concerns and will take into consideration all documents in their various forms when considering the pending Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff also asks for camera footage of 6 barracks on 01-11-2021 to 01-12-2021 to establish there was a “Quarantine Sign” on the door due to inmates in that area having tested positive for Covid-19. (Doc. No. 77 at 10). The camera footage is not determinative of Plaintiff's claims here. Further, the Court notes that discovery in this case closed on February 28, 2024. (Doc. No. 26). As such, Plaintiff's Motion for Order (Doc. No. 77) is denied.
II. Motion to Extend Time
Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 80) is granted. Plaintiff must file her Response to the ADC Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 67) by July 30, 2024.
IT IS SO ORDERED.