From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RICHARDSON v. FLORIDA. PAROLE PROB

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 18, 1982
417 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AH-436.

July 13, 1982. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1982.

Appeal from the Parole and Probation Commission.

Forest Lee Richardson, pro se, for appellant.

Catherine L. Dickson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.


This appeal challenges action by the Florida Parole and Probation Commission establishing a presumptive parole release date. This court has emphasized the Commission's statutory and rule obligation to adequately explain its decision to aggravate a prisoner's presumptive parole release date. Baker v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 384 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Battis v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 386 So.2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). This appeal arose primarily because the Commission initially did not explain its decision to aggravate. We affirm the Commission's action only because it provided a marginally acceptable explanation of its action in an amendment one day before appellant filed his notice of appeal. The Commission is directed to comply with the letter and spirit of the statute and rules requiring an adequate explanation of its decisions.

McCORD and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

RICHARDSON v. FLORIDA. PAROLE PROB

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 18, 1982
417 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

RICHARDSON v. FLORIDA. PAROLE PROB

Case Details

Full title:FOREST LEE RICHARDSON, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 18, 1982

Citations

417 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Fields v. Fla. Parole Prob. Com'n

The Commission has a statutory duty to specify with individual particularity the reasons for going outside…