Richardson v. Dennis, Corry, Porter Thornton

3 Citing cases

  1. Wet Walls, Inc. v. Ledezma

    598 S.E.2d 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 7 times

    Given the State Board's finding that Ledezma is totally disabled, Maloney does not apply. See Richardson v. Dennis, Corry, Porter Thornton, 216 Ga. App. 476, 477 ( 454 SE2d 643) (1995). 4. Finally, the employer argues that Ledezma's claim for benefits is barred by the two-year statute of limitation contained in OCGA ยง 34-9-104.

  2. West Marietta Hardware v. Chandler

    227 Ga. App. 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 1 times

    In those circumstances, a search for suitable employment would be a "purposeless demonstration of their disability by seeking work . . . they are unable to perform." Richardson v. Dennis, Corry, Porter Thornton, 216 Ga. App. 476, 477 ( 454 S.E.2d 643) (1995). The employer and insurer contend that Chandler did not meet the requirements of Maloney because she showed no search for work.

  3. Waffle House v. Padgett

    225 Ga. App. 144 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 5 times

    " Gilbert/Robinson, Inc. v. Meyers, 214 Ga. App. 510, 512 ( 448 S.E.2d 246) (1994). Padgett's contention that she need not show a diligent search for work, based on Richardson v. Dennis, Corry c., 216 Ga. App. 476, 477 ( 454 S.E.2d 643) (1995), is without merit. In that case, it was undisputed that Richardson suffered from a total disability due to his injury and was unable to work at all.