Richardson v. CMS

Full title: Cynthia RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. ARAMARK/SEDGEWICK CMS, Appellees.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 11, 2014

134 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 1D13–4138.

2014-04-11

Cynthia RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. ARAMARK/SEDGEWICK CMS, Appellees.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Thomas W. Sculco, Judge. Charles H. Leo of Charles H. Leo, P.A., Orlando, and Richard W. Ervin, III, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. James H. Wyman of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Thomas W. Sculco, Judge.
Charles H. Leo of Charles H. Leo, P.A., Orlando, and Richard W. Ervin, III, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. James H. Wyman of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables, for Appellees.

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Company, 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. We, therefore, decline to follow the Appellant's suggestion that we certify additional questions of great public importance relating to the instant case. ROWE, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.