denying an extension of time because, "[l]ike any other litigant, the State of Mississippi must choose between hiring more attorneys and taking fewer appeals"
Summary of this case from Universal Grp. Dev. Inc. v. Wanzhong YuNo. 90-6065.
January 7, 1991, October TERM, 1990.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 904 F. 2d 1050.
denying an extension of time because, "[l]ike any other litigant, the State of Mississippi must choose between hiring more attorneys and taking fewer appeals"
Summary of this case from Universal Grp. Dev. Inc. v. Wanzhong Yuinterpreting Vermont Rule of Evidence 504
Summary of this case from Curran v. PasekFull title:RICHARDSON v. CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, OHIO, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 7, 1991
In deciding whether a departure under § 4A1.3 is justified, a district court considers the historical facts…
Smith v. DixonAlthough the North Carolina Supreme Court denied certiorari following the superior court's decision on…