From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Bayati

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 20, 2024
2:23-cv-9385-DSF-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-9385-DSF-ASx

06-20-2024

EILEEN RICHARDSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEMIRA BAYATI, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge

The Court having issued an order to show cause re dismissal for lack of prosecution and Plaintiffs having failed to respond within the time allowed by the Court, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs take nothing, that the action be dismissed without prejudice, and that Defendants recover costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Bayati

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 20, 2024
2:23-cv-9385-DSF-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Richardson v. Bayati

Case Details

Full title:EILEEN RICHARDSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEMIRA BAYATI, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 20, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-9385-DSF-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)