From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Bayati

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 8, 2024
2:23-cv-09385-DSF-AS (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-09385-DSF-AS

05-08-2024

EILEEN RICHARDSON, et al. Plaintiff(s), v. SEMIRA BAYATI, et al. Defendant(s).


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to serve process on the defendants within 90 days of the filing of the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The Court may extend this deadline for good cause. Id. More than 90 days have passed since the complaint in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service for at least one defendant. Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause no later than May 22, 2024 why the unserved defendant(s) should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of proof(s) of service showing that the relevant defendant(s) was/were served within the 90-day period or a showing of good cause for extending the service period constitute adequate responses to this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Bayati

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 8, 2024
2:23-cv-09385-DSF-AS (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Richardson v. Bayati

Case Details

Full title:EILEEN RICHARDSON, et al. Plaintiff(s), v. SEMIRA BAYATI, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 8, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-09385-DSF-AS (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2024)