From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Avery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 23, 2018
No. 3:16-CV-2631-M (N.D. Tex. Oct. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:16-CV-2631-M

10-23-2018

SCOTT DAMON RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. AVERY #994, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, by separate judgment this action will be dismissed with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) as legally frivolous or for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.

SIGNED this 23rd day of October, 2018.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Richardson v. Avery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 23, 2018
No. 3:16-CV-2631-M (N.D. Tex. Oct. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Richardson v. Avery

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT DAMON RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. AVERY #994, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 23, 2018

Citations

No. 3:16-CV-2631-M (N.D. Tex. Oct. 23, 2018)

Citing Cases

Dougherty v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Absent any actionable identifying information, Dougherty has failed to state a claim against the Doe…

Dougherty v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Absent any actionable identifying information, Dougherty has failed to state a claim against the Doe…