From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 16, 1964
134 S.E.2d 827 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

40472.

DECIDED JANUARY 16, 1964.

Appellate procedure. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Moore.

Scott, Scroggins, Cash Crim, Frank T. Cash, for plaintiff in error.

Foster Fudge, Norman H. Fudge, contra.


The parties in this appeal claim title to real estate which the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta brought an action to condemn. The defendant in error filed an answer in the condemnation suit praying (a) that fee simple title to the tract of land be decreed in her and (b) that she have judgment awarding her the fund found to be the value of the tract. The plaintiff in error prayed for similar relief. It was stipulated that the construction of the will, which was all of the evidence in the case, was the sole issue to be determined by the judge without a jury. The trial court entered up a judgment construing the will in favor of the defendant in error; however, the record does not show that there has been a condemnation award. The writ of error to the Supreme Court (construction of a will) was transferred to this court by a holding that "The sole question was who was entitled to the funds. . . " There being no final judgment as yet on this question, the writ of error must be dismissed for lack of a final judgment over which this court has jurisdiction. Code Ann. § 6-701.

Writ of error dismissed. Nichols, P. J., and Russell, J., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 16, 1964.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 16, 1964
134 S.E.2d 827 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Richardson v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:RICHARDSON v. ANDERSON

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 16, 1964

Citations

134 S.E.2d 827 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)
134 S.E.2d 827

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Anderson

When received in this court, Judge Hall pointed out that no final judgment regarding the disposition of…