From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 2002
813 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-3345.

April 3, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Michael D. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 88-9626 CFA02.

Merrick Roy Richards, Bradenton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the circuit court's order denying appellant's 3.850 motion. The circuit court denied the motion as being untimely, but we find that the motion was timely filed pursuant to Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42, 46 (Fla. 2000). Nonetheless, we affirm the circuit court's order because appellant's motion failed to include all of the information required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 3.850(c). However, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a motion that includes the information required by rule 3.850(c) no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance of the mandate.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 2002
813 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Richards v. State

Case Details

Full title:MERRICK ROY RICHARDS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 3, 2002

Citations

813 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)