Opinion
July 22, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence, J.).
Order affirmed, with costs.
Special Term did not abuse its discretion in limiting the use of disclosure devices pursuant to CPLR 3103 where it appeared, as the court noted, that "the disclosure devices being employed by defendants herein may be an unreasonable annoyance, intended to harass and overburden plaintiff and his counsel" ( see, Matter of Westchester Rockland Newspapers v. Marbach, 66 A.D.2d 335). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.