From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richards v. Lindquist

Supreme Court of Nevada
May 17, 1978
576 P.2d 749 (Nev. 1978)

Opinion

No. 8907

April 6, 1978 Rehearing denied May 17, 1978

Appeal from summary judgment, Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; John E. Gabrielli, Judge.

Donnell Richards and Paul A. Richards, Reno, and John Tom Ross, Carson City, for Appellants.

C. Nicholas Pereos, Reno, for Respondents and Third-Party Respondents Lindquist and Kennedy.

Laxalt, Berry Allison, Carson City, for Third-Party Respondent Mulholland.

H. Dale Murphy, Reno, for Third-Party Respondent Murphy.


OPINION


In separate actions consolidated for trial, appellant Richards sought to (1) foreclose on a deed of trust securing a promissory note, and (2) set aside a transfer of property allegedly made to defraud creditors. Respondents moved for and were granted summary judgment.

Appellant here contends summary judgment was not proper because numerous issues of material fact are in dispute. Even viewing the record, as we must, in a light most favorable to appellant, we perceive no such dispute in the material facts; accordingly, the district court judgment is affirmed. NRCP 56; Olson v. Iacometti, 91 Nev. 241, 533 P.2d 1360 (1975).


Summaries of

Richards v. Lindquist

Supreme Court of Nevada
May 17, 1978
576 P.2d 749 (Nev. 1978)
Case details for

Richards v. Lindquist

Case Details

Full title:DONNELL RICHARDS, APPELLANT, v. WILHELMINA S. LINDQUIST, RENEE L. KENNEDY…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: May 17, 1978

Citations

576 P.2d 749 (Nev. 1978)
576 P.2d 749

Citing Cases

Sims v. Veneman

Accordingly, summary judgment was proper. NRCP 56; Richards v. Lindquist, 94 Nev. 163, 576 P.2d 749 (1978);…