From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richards v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 16, 2012
Case No. 3:12-CV-00419-RCJ-(VPC) (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-CV-00419-RCJ-(VPC)

10-16-2012

JONATHAN M. RICHARDS, Petitioner, v. JAMES "GREG" COX, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

The copy of order #4, instructing plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee, was returned in the mail with the notation that plaintiff is no longer in custody at the High Desert State Prison. Plaintiff has failed to comply with local rule LSR 2-2, which requires him to promptly inform the court of any changes in address.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to inform the court of his current address. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly.

____________________

ROBERT C. JONES

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Richards v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 16, 2012
Case No. 3:12-CV-00419-RCJ-(VPC) (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Richards v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN M. RICHARDS, Petitioner, v. JAMES "GREG" COX, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 16, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:12-CV-00419-RCJ-(VPC) (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2012)