Richard v. Joseph

Full title: CRAIG RICHARD, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

2:21-cv-0975 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0975 KJN P

09-16-2021

CRAIG RICHARD, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH, et al., Defendants.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants' motion to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project. (ECF No. 19.) Good cause appearing, defendants' motion is granted.

Plaintiff filed a motion for a settlement conference. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff's motion is denied because both parties do not agree to a settlement conference.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to opt out (ECF No. 19) is granted;

2. Plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference (ECF No. 17) is denied;

3. The stay of this action is lifted; and

4. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within fourteen days from the date of this order.