From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richard S. Bell Plumbing Heating v. Penzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 228 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 13, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Isseks, J.).


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The judgment appealed from denied petitioner's application as premature because it had not been determined whether the judgment debtor had an interest in the escrow funds. Based on the facts as they existed at the time the judgment was made, we agree with Special Term that the application for the direction to turn over the funds was premature. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richard S. Bell Plumbing Heating v. Penzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 228 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Richard S. Bell Plumbing Heating v. Penzer

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD S. BELL PLUMBING HEATING, INC., Appellant, v. PENZER AND SLOAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 228 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)