From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rich v. N.Y.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21 Civ. 3835 (AT) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 3835 (AT) (GWG)

06-22-2022

BENAJMIN RICH Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants.


ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants Shipla Kalra, David Nasar, New York County District Attorney's Office, and Cyrus Vance, Jr. have filed a motion to dismiss that relies on materials outside the pleadings. It is the Court's intention to treat this motion as one for summary judgment as explained in the separate Local Civil Rule 12.1 Notice that was served on the plaintiff. If plaintiff seeks to contradict any facts asserted in that motion, including the facts stated in the Declaration of Corey S. Shoock, dated June 17, 2022, with attachments, he is directed to provide sworn statements or other testimony contradicting those facts or make an application pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d), as is more fully explained in the Local Civil Rule 12.1 Notice.

Plaintiff's opposition papers are due on July 18, 2022. Any reply may be filed by August 1, 2022.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rich v. N.Y.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21 Civ. 3835 (AT) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Rich v. N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:BENAJMIN RICH Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 3835 (AT) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)