Opinion
Argued June 9, 1893
Decided June 27, 1893
Leo C. Dessar for appellant.
Brainard Tolles for respondents.
Per Curiam mem. for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rich v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 27, 1893
34 N.E. 402 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Rich v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 27, 1893
34 N.E. 402 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Rich v. Manhattan Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:ALEXANDER RICH, Appellant, v . THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 27, 1893
Citations
34 N.E. 402 (N.Y. 1893)
34 N.E. 402
53 N.Y. St. Rptr. 346
Citing Cases
New Life Baptist Ch. Acad. v. E. Longmeadow
" Plaintiffs believe this interpretation is not only compelled by the language of M.G.L. c. 76, § 1, but is…
Delconte v. North CarolinaMeyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 400, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042. The object is that all children shall be…