Rice, v. N.Y. State Workers' Comp. Bd.

1 Citing case

  1. Ficel Transp. v. State

    209 A.D.3d 1153 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)   Cited 9 times

    In the Wayne County action, Supreme Court (Healey, J.) found that the MFN clause entitled those plaintiffs to the monthly offsets provided in the Riccelli action. The Fourth Department reversed that judgment, concluding that Supreme Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction (seeRice v. New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd., 192 A.D.3d 1605, 1606, 140 N.Y.S.3d 857 [4th Dept. 2021] ). Consequently, the findings set forth in the Wayne County judgment have no precedential or estoppel effect (see generallyEditorial Photocolor Archives, Inc. v. Granger Collection, 61 N.Y.2d 517, 523, 474 N.Y.S.2d 964, 463 N.E.2d 365 [1984] ["A judgment or order issued without subject matter jurisdiction is void"]). Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.