From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rice v. Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 8, 1945
40 A.2d 561 (N.J. 1945)

Opinion

Submitted October 2, 1944 —

Decided January 8, 1945.

On certiorari.

Before Justices CASE, BODINE and PORTER.

For the prosecutors, Louis Hood and Hannoch Lasser ( Louis Hood, Herbert J. Hannoch and Morris Weinstein, of counsel).

For the defendant, Philip J. Schotland, corporation counsel of the city of Newark ( Joseph A. Ward, of counsel).


The writ brings before us for review an ordinance designated as the "Airport Zoning Ordinance of the City of Newark." The prosecutors own property previously zoned for factories and heavy industries, consisting of a parcel of twenty-five acres and another parcel of between twelve and thirteen acres, and assessed for taxation by the City of Newark at valuations of $97,400 and $64,000, respectively. By the provisions of the ordinance in question the height and kind of structures on the property of prosecutors is so restricted as to render its use for industrial purposes useless.

Prosecutor argues that the ordinance is illegal for constitutional and statutory reasons.

The ordinance was also attacked in the case of Yara Engineering Corp. v. Newark, at this term, 132 N.J.L. 370. An opinion is being filed herewith in that case, setting aside the ordinance for reasons therein expressed.


Summaries of

Rice v. Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 8, 1945
40 A.2d 561 (N.J. 1945)
Case details for

Rice v. Newark

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER S. RICE AND LOUIS HOOD, EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES UNDER THE LAST…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 8, 1945

Citations

40 A.2d 561 (N.J. 1945)
40 A.2d 561

Citing Cases

Roark v. City of Caldwell

* * * See also: Rice v. City of Newark, 132 N.J.L. 387, 40 A.2d 561 (1945); Annot. 77 A.L.R.2d 1355, 1362. We…

Depositors Trust Company of Augusta v. Johnson

And as further stated in Humer, supra, in aid to our search for legislative intent, we must have in mind that…