From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rice v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 8, 1961
120 S.E.2d 615 (Ga. 1961)

Opinion

21231.

ARGUED MAY 8, 1961.

DECIDED JUNE 8, 1961.

Injunction. Gwinnett Superior Court. Before Judge Pittard.

Aaron Baranan, Merritt Pruitt, for plaintiff in error.

Weldon Shows, contra.


Where, as in the case sub judice, the petition alleges that the defendant caused a distress warrant to issue against the plaintiff maliciously and without probable cause, but fails to allege that the distress-warrant proceedings terminated favorably to the plaintiff, the petition set forth no cause of action in trespass ( Sledge v. McLaren, 29 Ga. 74; Parter v. Johnson, 96 Ga. 148, 23 S.E. 123; Fulton Grocery Co. v. Maddox, 111 Ga. 260, 36 S.E. 647), or for malicious use of process. Sparrow v. Weld, 177 Ga. 134 ( 169 S.E. 487). There is a clear distinction between the seizure of property under a valid process, as in this case, and the seizure of property of a person under process which is invalid or void upon its face, or where no process has ever issued against him.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED MAY 8, 1961 — DECIDED JUNE 8, 1961.


Summaries of

Rice v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 8, 1961
120 S.E.2d 615 (Ga. 1961)
Case details for

Rice v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:RICE v. LEWIS et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jun 8, 1961

Citations

120 S.E.2d 615 (Ga. 1961)
120 S.E.2d 615

Citing Cases

Analytical Systems, Inc. v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.

In other words, the court effectively distinguished "an action for trespass from an action for malicious use…