Opinion
22-6511
03-07-2023
Nathaniel Dante Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 27, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00044-CCE-JLW)
Nathaniel Dante Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Nathaniel Dante Rice seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing without prejudice Rice's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to provide the necessary forms, and providing Rice the opportunity to file an amended complaint. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Rice seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 793, 797 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order) (explaining that a district court's "order that dismisses a complaint with leave to amend is not a final decision" and that plaintiff must either file an amended complaint in the district court or "request that the district court enter a final decision dismissing [his] case without leave to amend"). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED