From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rice v. Comm'rs of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 22, 2013
Case No. 12-14438 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-14438

11-22-2013

Jarteaves Rice, Plaintiff, v. Commissioners of Social Security, Defendant.


Honorable Sean F. Cox


ORDER

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brought this action challenging the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for Childhood Supplemental Security Income under the Social Security Act. Thereafter, the matter was referred to Magistrate Steven Whalen for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C).

Thereafter, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued on October 31, 2013, Magistrate Judge Whalen recommended that this Court: 1) Deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and 2) in lieu of granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment at this time, remand the action to the administrative level pursuant to the sixth sentence of § 405(g).

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. "The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made." Id.

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the October 31, 2013, R&R. IT IS ORDERED that: 1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and 2) in lieu of granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment at this time, the Court hereby REMANDS this action to the administrative level pursuant to the sixth sentence of § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on November 22, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Jennifer McCoy

Case Manager


Summaries of

Rice v. Comm'rs of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 22, 2013
Case No. 12-14438 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Rice v. Comm'rs of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Jarteaves Rice, Plaintiff, v. Commissioners of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-14438 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 2013)