Opinion
2:20-CV-1542-JCM-DJA
02-27-2023
ASHLEY RICE, individually and as special administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN; Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS; CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT; ROBERT JAMESON, individually; DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ. E. MATTHEW FREEMAN, ESQ. ATTORNEY' FOR DEFENDANTS PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP PETER GOLDSTEIN, ESQ.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ. E. MATTHEW FREEMAN, ESQ. ATTORNEY' FOR DEFENDANTS
PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP PETER GOLDSTEIN, ESQ.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE (ECF No. 48) TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 42)
(SECOND REQUEST)
Plaintiff Ashley Rice, individually and as special administrator of the estate of Robert Wenman (“Plaintiff”), by and through her undersigned counsel of record, and Defendants City of North Las Vegas, City of North Las Vegas Police Department and Robert Jameson (“Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, as follows:
1. On November 21, 2022, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 56(d) (ECF No. 42);
2. By stipulation and order, the deadline for Plaintiff's Response was extended from December 12, 2022 to January 16, 2023, (ECF 45). The deadline for Defendant's Reply in support of its Motion was extended to January 30, 2023. Plaintiff timely filed her Response (ECF No. 48) on January 16, 2023.
3. Due to the complexity of the issues, and the amount of video evidence, Defendants require additional time to file its reply brief, through and including March 15, 2023.
The parties to this action are not making this request for the purpose of unduly delaying the trial in this matter. This is the second stipulation for extension of time to file Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 56(d).
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED: