Opinion
2:20-cv-01542-JCM-DJA
12-05-2022
PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP PETER GOLDSTEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff ASHLEY RICE, individually and as special Administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN Robert W. Freeman, Esq. Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz Noel E. Eidsmore, Esq Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz
PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP PETER GOLDSTEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff ASHLEY RICE, individually and as special Administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN
Robert W. Freeman, Esq. Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz
Noel E. Eidsmore, Esq Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [42][SBN 6992]
Plaintiff, ASHLEY RICE, individually and as Special Administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN and Defendants CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, et al. (collectively hereinafter the “PARTIES”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
The due date for the Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42) shall be extended from December 12, 2022 to January 16, 2023.
REASON FOR EXTENSION
Due to the complexity of the issues, the amount of video evidence, and the upcoming holiday seasons, the PARTIES hereby agree to allow Plaintiffs an additional 35 days to file their Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED