From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rice v. City of N. Las Vegas (CNLV)

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 5, 2022
2:20-cv-01542-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01542-JCM-DJA

12-05-2022

ASHLEY RICE, individually and as special administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN; Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS (CNLV); ROBERT JAMESON, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; SKYLER LEE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JASON LAWRENCE, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; BARNEY BRUCKEN, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; ANN TAYLOR, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; MARK SURANOWITZ, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; AND DOES 6-10. Defendants.

PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP PETER GOLDSTEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff ASHLEY RICE, individually and as special Administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN Robert W. Freeman, Esq. Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz Noel E. Eidsmore, Esq Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz


PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP PETER GOLDSTEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff ASHLEY RICE, individually and as special Administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN

Robert W. Freeman, Esq. Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz

Noel E. Eidsmore, Esq Attorney for Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Robert Jameson, Skyler Lee, Jason Lawrence, Barney Brucken, Ann Taylor, and Mark Suranowitz

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [42][SBN 6992]

Plaintiff, ASHLEY RICE, individually and as Special Administrator of the estate of ROBERT WENMAN and Defendants CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, et al. (collectively hereinafter the “PARTIES”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

The due date for the Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42) shall be extended from December 12, 2022 to January 16, 2023.

REASON FOR EXTENSION

Due to the complexity of the issues, the amount of video evidence, and the upcoming holiday seasons, the PARTIES hereby agree to allow Plaintiffs an additional 35 days to file their Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Rice v. City of N. Las Vegas (CNLV)

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 5, 2022
2:20-cv-01542-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Rice v. City of N. Las Vegas (CNLV)

Case Details

Full title:ASHLEY RICE, individually and as special administrator of the estate of…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-01542-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2022)