Opinion
ED 110109
06-28-2022
Larry RICE, Appellant, v. ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP, Thomas Cummings, and Jeffrey L. Schultz, Respondents.
Larry Rice, Appellant Acting Pro Se. Daniel K. O'Toole, Paul L. Brusati, Jeffery T. McPherson, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, 7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1800, St. Louis, MO 63105, Kevin William Prewitt, 2345 Grand Blvd., Suite 1500, Kansas City, MO 64108-2617, for respondents.
Larry Rice, Appellant Acting Pro Se.
Daniel K. O'Toole, Paul L. Brusati, Jeffery T. McPherson, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, 7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1800, St. Louis, MO 63105, Kevin William Prewitt, 2345 Grand Blvd., Suite 1500, Kansas City, MO 64108-2617, for respondents.
Before Michael E. Gardner, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry Rice (Rice) appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for a declaratory judgment against Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, Thomas Cummings, and Jeffrey Schultz (collectively, Defendants). Defendants’ motion to dismiss and for sanctions are denied.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
All rule references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2020), unless otherwise indicated.