Summary
In Gold Coast, however, this court determined the intention of the Riccios and Gold Coast, parties who had no prior dealings with each other.
Summary of this case from Riccio v. SteinOpinion
No. 87-642.
March 8, 1988.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Leonard Rivkind, Judge.
Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg, Howland Mintz and Sheldon Rosenberg, for appellants.
Broad Cassel and Steven W. Davis, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
The record supports the trial court's determination that the parties intended the Gold Coast Capital Corporation mortgage be superior to the Riccio purchase money second mortgage. We therefore affirm the Final Judgment. See Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Tippett v. Frank, 238 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Affirmed.