Opinion
(7271)
Argued May 16, 1989
Decision released June 8, 1989
Action for the dissolution of a marriage, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Litchfield and tried to the court, Pickett, J.; judgment dissolving the marriage and granting certain other relief; thereafter, the court denied the defendant's motion to modify the award of child support, and the defendant appealed to this court. No error.
Edward T. Ricaardi, pro se, the appellant (defendant).
Mark M. Wrenn, with whom, on the brief, was James P. Caulfield, for the appellee (plaintiff).
The defendant appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to modify child support payments.
The defendant, as the appellant, has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken. Manzin v. United Bank Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513, 517, 506 A.2d 169 (1986). We have carefully considered the defendant's claims of error and, after affording those claims the appropriate scope of review, we find that the defendant has not met his burden.