From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riccardi v. Adinolfi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1990
168 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 3, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion is denied.

Summary judgment having been denied to the plaintiff by a prior order of the court, and that determination having become the law of the case, it was improper for the court, as a court of coordinate jurisdiction, to grant the plaintiff's subsequent motion for the identical relief based on identical facts (see, Siegel, N Y Prac § 448; 1 Carmody-Wait 2d, §§ 2:64-2:69; see, Matter of Dondi v. Jones, 40 N.Y.2d 8, 15; State of New York v. Barclays Bank, 151 A.D.2d 19, 21, affd. 76 N.Y.2d 533; see also, Merrill v. Robinson, 106 A.D.2d 818), and we decline to address the merits of the plaintiff's entitlement to summary judgment (see, Post v. Post, 141 A.D.2d 518, 519). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Riccardi v. Adinolfi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1990
168 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Riccardi v. Adinolfi

Case Details

Full title:VINCENZINA RICCARDI, Respondent, v. ARTHUR A. ADINOLFI, Appellant. (And a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Gansburg v. Blachman

(See Brownrigg v. New York City Housing Authority, 29 A.D.3d 721, 722, 815 N.Y.S.2d 681 [2d Dept 2006] ). The…

Between v. Blachman

having become the law of the case, it was improper for the court, as a court of coordinate jurisdiction, to…