From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riad v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 4, 2019
CIVIL ACTION No. 19-4292 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 19-4292

12-04-2019

JOSEPH RIAD et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM

In its Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Plaintiffs' Unauthorized Account Claims, Defendant Wells Fargo seeks to compel arbitration on claims concerning the unauthorized opening of accounts, of which Plaintiffs allege they were not aware, based on arbitration clauses in agreements for Plaintiffs' authorized accounts. ECF No. 8. Wells Fargo contends that "any and all disputes" that Plaintiffs may have with Wells Fargo "were subject to arbitration" through account agreements for existing accounts, even though Plaintiffs do not allege they signed any arbitration agreements for the unauthorized accounts. See id. at 14-15 ("[N]o matter when Plaintiffs['] alleged unauthorized account claims may have allegedly occurred, they are subject to arbitration per the terms of the account agreements for the Indisputable Accounts.").

"Arbitration is a matter of contract, and the FAA requires courts to honor parties' expectations." AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception, 563 U.S. 333 (2011) (citing Rent-A-Ctr., W., Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 67 (2010)). "[A] party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit." AT & T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986) (quoting Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 (1960)). Plaintiffs allege that an employee or employees of Defendant Wells Fargo opened numerous unauthorized accounts in Plaintiffs' name or in which Plaintiffs held a beneficial interest. ECF No. 1 at ¶¶ 64, 190, 191. As neither party claims that Plaintiffs signed an arbitration agreement for the unauthorized accounts, Defendant's attempt to bind Plaintiffs to arbitration through the accounts they did have with Wells Fargo, which are not the subject of the claims at issue, is utterly unpersuasive. Therefore, this Court does not conclude that Plaintiffs agreed to submit to arbitration on these unauthorized account claims.

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Plaintiffs' Unauthorized Account Claims (ECF No. 8) will be denied. If discovery reveals that these unauthorized accounts are, in fact, authorized and that there was a meeting of the minds of the parties, Defendant may, at that time, refile to compel arbitration. An appropriate order will follow. DATE: 12-4-2019

BY THE COURT:

/s/ _________

CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE


Summaries of

Riad v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 4, 2019
CIVIL ACTION No. 19-4292 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Riad v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RIAD et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 4, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 19-4292 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2019)