Opinion
3:06-cv-00652-RCJ-VPC
08-10-2011
MICHAEL LAMAR RHYMES, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et at., Respondents.
ORDER
This is a closed habeas corpus action. On February 10, 2010, this habeas corpus action was dismissed with prejudice and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 17 & 18). This Court has previously denied petitioner a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 17). By order filed November 29, 2010, this Court granted petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (ECF No. 23).
Petitioner has filed a motion asking for clarification of this Court's order filed November 29, 2010. (ECF No. 25). Petitioner seeks information concerning a potential appeal from this Court's judgment. The Court's record reflects that no notice of appeal from this Court's judgment was ever filed. Petitioner's motion for clarification is denied as moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for clarification (ECF No. 25) is DENIED AS MOOT.
_______________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE