From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhone v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Dec 29, 1998
983 S.W.2d 205 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 74228

December 29, 1998

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. FLOYD McBRIDE, JUDGE.

Mark A. Grothoff, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, Missouri 65201-3724, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Linda Lemke, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Dowd, Jr., C.J., Karohl, J. and Crist, Sr. J.


ORDER


Movant appeals denial of Rule 29.15 relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirmed sentences on charges of robbery in the first degree and possession of a controlled substance in Movant's direct appeal. State v. Rhone, 943 S.W.2d 833 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997).

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find both points relied on are without merit. An extended opinion reciting the relevant facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment denying relief in affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rhone v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Dec 29, 1998
983 S.W.2d 205 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Rhone v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL RHONE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Dec 29, 1998

Citations

983 S.W.2d 205 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)