Rhodes v. Sutter Health

Full title: BETH A. RHODES, M.D., Plaintiff, v. SUTTER HEALTH, A California…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Case No. 2:12 CV-00013-WBS-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12 CV-00013-WBS-DAD

01-27-2012

BETH A. RHODES, M.D., Plaintiff, v. SUTTER HEALTH, A California Corporation, SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL FOUNDATION, a California Corporation, THE GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a California Corporation, Defendants.

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP CARLA J. HARTLEY (SBN 117213) DANIELLE L. TIZOL (SBN 259702) Attorneys for Defendant GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

CARLA J. HARTLEY (SBN 117213)

DANIELLE L. TIZOL (SBN 259702)

Attorneys for Defendant

GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

FOR DEFENDANT GOULD MEDICAL

GROUP TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff BETH A. RHODES, M.D., and Defendant GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC. (the "Group") that the time period for the Group to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended 28 days, to February 24, 2012.

LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN M. MURPHY

____________

P. Bobby Shukla

Attorneys for Plaintiff

BETH A. RHODES, M.D.

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

____________

Carla J. Hartley

Attorneys for Defendant

GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE