From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 18, 1924
102 So. 919 (Ala. 1924)

Opinion

1 Div. 303.

December 18, 1924.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Joel W. Goldsby, Judge.

J. F. Hogan and G. Leslie Darden, both of Mobile, for appellant. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Briefs of respective counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The appeal in this case is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, requested charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed on appeal, as it will be presumed that the trial court correctly charged the law in the oral instructions to the jury. Moreover, the propositions of law stated in the charges refused defendant were fully covered by the numerous charges given at defendant's request. No error appearing in the record, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 18, 1924
102 So. 919 (Ala. 1924)
Case details for

Rhodes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anna Amelia RHODES, alias, etc., v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Dec 18, 1924

Citations

102 So. 919 (Ala. 1924)
212 Ala. 698