From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Sailor

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 13, 2013
Cv 08-6419-Ddp (Dtb) (C.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion


KAVIN MAURICE RHODES, Plaintiff, v. R. SAILOR, et al., Defendants. No. Cv 08-6419-Ddp (Dtb) United States District Court, C.D. California. May 13, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that defendants Sailor and Priest's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted without leave to amend and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action as follows: (a) As to plaintiff's federal civil rights claim with prejudice and (b) as to plaintiff's state law claims without prejudice to plaintiff raising such claims in state court.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Sailor

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 13, 2013
Cv 08-6419-Ddp (Dtb) (C.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Sailor

Case Details

Full title:KAVIN MAURICE RHODES, Plaintiff, v. R. SAILOR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

Cv 08-6419-Ddp (Dtb) (C.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)