From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2013
CASE No. 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2013)

Opinion

CASE No. 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB PC

12-17-2013

KAVIN M. RHODES, Plaintiff v. M. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Kavin M. Rhodes, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 4, 2002. On August 5, 2013, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 296.) On September 12, 2013, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff a forty-five day extension of time to file an opposition. (ECF No. 301.) More than forty-five days has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order; and

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2013
CASE No. 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:KAVIN M. RHODES, Plaintiff v. M. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

CASE No. 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2013)