From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Pittard

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Apr 5, 2011
No. 3:09-00181, No. 3:09-00780 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:09-00181, No. 3:09-00780.

April 5, 2011


ORDER


In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, Defendants City of Murfreesboro's and Thad Scott's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No, 24) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff's § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, Plaintiff's state law claims against Defendants Scott and City of Murfreesboro are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Defendant Orkin, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 34) is DENIED WITHOUT PERJUDICE given the Court's lack of jurisdiction. Any remaining claims in the action against Defendants Jeffrey Pittard, Eclipse Marketing Inc. and Orkin, Inc. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

This is the Final Order in the action.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Pittard

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Apr 5, 2011
No. 3:09-00181, No. 3:09-00780 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Pittard

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN RHODES Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY PITTARD, ECLIPSE MARKETING INC. and…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Apr 5, 2011

Citations

No. 3:09-00181, No. 3:09-00780 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2011)