From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Fabian

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 12, 2005
Civil No. 04-176 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Sep. 12, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 04-176 (RHK/SRN).

September 12, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner has filed timely Objections to the April 22, 2005, Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. The parties have provided detailed submissions in support of, and in opposition to, the Objections.

The Court has reviewed de novo the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation. That review satisfies the undersigned that Judge Nelson `s recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied is fully supported by the factual record before Judge Nelson and the controlling legal principles relied upon by her. Her Report and Recommendation is thorough and well reasoned and this Court will adopt it in its entirety believing that no useful purpose would be served by a second opinion reaching the same conclusions.

Accordingly, and upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Objections (Doc. No. 40) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 37) is ADOPTED; and

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Fabian

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 12, 2005
Civil No. 04-176 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Sep. 12, 2005)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Fabian

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS DANIEL RHODES, Petitioner, v. JOAN FABIAN, MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 12, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 04-176 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Sep. 12, 2005)

Citing Cases

Patrick's Rest., LLC v. Singh

Singh is correct that this filing is not authorized by Local Rule 7.1(i). See Rhodes v. Fabian, No. 04-cv-176…