From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhoda v. Alameda County

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
58 Cal. 357 (Cal. 1881)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, in the Superior Court of Alameda County. Crane, J.

         COUNSEL

          William & George Leviston, for Appellants.

          E. M. Gibson, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         The Court found that the vault, at the time of its removal, was a fixture, and part of the realty, and was the property of plaintiffs; that defendants had no legal right to remove it; and that its value, to be sold in open market, was, at the time of its removal, not over five hundred dollars; and thereupon the Court rendered judgment for that amount. In such case the measure of damages is the value of the article as it was in place as a part of the realty, immediately preceding its removal; not what it would sell for in open market removed from the building. ( Civ. Code, § 3333; Whitbeck v. N.Y. Central R. R. Co., 36 Barb. 644.)

         Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Rhoda v. Alameda County

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
58 Cal. 357 (Cal. 1881)
Case details for

Rhoda v. Alameda County

Case Details

Full title:F. RHODA et al. v. ALAMEDA COUNTY

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1881

Citations

58 Cal. 357 (Cal. 1881)

Citing Cases

Wilmerton v. Morton

[4] That the proper measure of damages was applied is clear. As early as Rhoda v. Alameda County, 58 Cal.…

Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank v. Bortenstein

In such cases, the measure of damages is the value of the improvement as it was in place, as a part of the…