From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhoads v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 24, 1993
620 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1993)

Opinion

No. 80851.

June 24, 1993.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District — Case No. 91-03570, Hillsborough County.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ann P. Corcoran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.


We review the decision of the district court of appeal, Rhoads v. State, 608 So.2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981). The district court's decision is quashed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rhoads v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 24, 1993
620 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1993)
Case details for

Rhoads v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ENNIS RHOADS, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 24, 1993

Citations

620 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1993)