R.H.H. v. N.L.S.

Full title: R.H.H., Petitioner/Respondent, v. N.L.S., Respondent/Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Jun 17, 2014

434 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100550.

2014-06-17

R.H.H., Petitioner/Respondent, v. N.L.S., Respondent/Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lewis County, 13LE–CV00195, Fred L. Westhoff, Judge. Christopher Gerard Scholz, Scholz, Loos, Palmer, Siebers & Duesterhaus, LLP, Quincy, IL, for Appellant. John Gravatt McIntosh, De Coster Law, Monticello, MO, for Juveniles.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lewis County, 13LE–CV00195, Fred L. Westhoff, Judge.
Christopher Gerard Scholz, Scholz, Loos, Palmer, Siebers & Duesterhaus, LLP, Quincy, IL, for Appellant. John Gravatt McIntosh, De Coster Law, Monticello, MO, for Juveniles.
Jeffrey Robert Curl, Curl & Hark, LLC, Hannibal, MO, for Respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

N.L.S. appeals from the court's Judgment of the Full Order of Child Protection (Full Order of Child Protection) temporarily awarding custody of T.N.H. and C.L.H. to R.H.H. and prohibiting N.L.S. from engaging in certain conduct for the duration of the Full Order of Child Protection. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).