From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rheman v. Rheman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
May 16, 2024
No. 13-23-00579-CV (Tex. App. May. 16, 2024)

Opinion

13-23-00579-CV

05-16-2024

THOMAS RHEMAN, Appellant, v. DEBORAH RHEMAN N/K/A DEBORAH SIBLEY, Appellee.


ON APPEAL FROM THE 103RD DISTRICT COURT OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña

ORDER

PER CURIAM

This cause is before the Court on appellant's motion to reinstate. On May 2, 2024, this Court dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution on grounds that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record, and otherwise failed to respond to notice from the Clerk of the Court requiring action. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). That same day, and before the Court issued its memorandum opinion, appellant paid for the clerk's record.

The Court, having fully considered appellant's motion to reinstate, is of the opinion that our memorandum opinion and accompanying judgment should be withdrawn in the interests of justice. Accordingly, we withdraw the memorandum opinion and judgment that were previously issued in this appeal. This cause remains pending before the Court. Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file his appellate brief. We caution the parties that our ruling on the motion to reinstate should not be construed as a ruling on the merits of this appeal.


Summaries of

Rheman v. Rheman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
May 16, 2024
No. 13-23-00579-CV (Tex. App. May. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Rheman v. Rheman

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS RHEMAN, Appellant, v. DEBORAH RHEMAN N/K/A DEBORAH SIBLEY, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: May 16, 2024

Citations

No. 13-23-00579-CV (Tex. App. May. 16, 2024)