Opinion
1:17-CV-1220 (DJS)
10-12-2021
APPEARANCES: RUTBERG BRESLOW Attorneys for Plaintiff LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL E. PRESSMAN Attorneys for Defendant OF COUNSEL: LAWRENCE A. BRESLOW, ESQ. CARMINE J. CAROLEI, ESQ. STEVEN H. COHEN, ESQ.
APPEARANCES:
RUTBERG BRESLOW
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL
E. PRESSMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
OF COUNSEL:
LAWRENCE A. BRESLOW, ESQ.
CARMINE J. CAROLEI, ESQ.
STEVEN H. COHEN, ESQ.
ORDER
DANIEL J. STEWART, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This matter was scheduled for trial beginning October 25, 2021, with the trial now adjourned to February 7, 2022. Dkt. No. 94. In connection with the October trial date, the parties filed several pretrial motions which the Court now addresses.
Defendant initially sought to preclude the testimony of Frederick Bremer, Dkt. No. 78, and to preclude the admission of certain medical records, Dkt. No. 79, but has now withdrawn those objections. Dkt. Nos. 92 & 95. Plaintiff filed a Motion in Limine seeking relief on a variety of matters. See Dkt. No. 90. During a telephone conference regarding the request to adjourn the trial, Plaintiff withdrew her application to preclude Defendant's experts. Plaintiff has now also withdrawn her objection to the use of the deposition testimony of Betty Gennarelli. Dkt. No. 93.
Defendant's motion seeking a ruling regarding the admissibility of its expert testimony, Dkt. No. 77, therefore, is moot.
The Court is appreciative of the efforts of counsel to narrow the disputes at trial.
Plaintiffs application to use the deposition testimony of Anthony Falco is deferred to the time of trial. Plaintiffs request to permit her experts to testify regarding applicable building codes, Dkt. No. 88 at p. 4, is granted since the violation of a building code may be some evidence of negligence. Elliott v. City of N.Y., 95 N.Y.2d 730, 734-35 (2001); Gonzalez v. State of N.Y., 60 A.D.3d 1193, 1194 (3d Dep't 2009).
IT IS SO ORDERED.