From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RHEA v. UHRY

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Oct 12, 2007
CASE NO. 3:05CV189 (VLB) (D. Conn. Oct. 12, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:05CV189 (VLB).

October 12, 2007


ORDER


Pending before the court is the defendant's Motion to Preclude Expert Testimony (doc. #162). Although the plaintiff's expert witness disclosure does not comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2), in light of the entire record, the plaintiff may have additional time to comply. The plaintiff is therefore ordered to produce the complete, signed expert report of Mr. Payne, fully complying with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2), on or before October 31, 2007. The defendant may depose Mr. Payne on or before November 30, 2007.

The motion to preclude is denied. Insofar as the defendant seeks to preclude Mr. Payne's testimony based on his qualifications and the substance of his opinions, that motion is denied without prejudice to refiling at the time of trial.

SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut.


Summaries of

RHEA v. UHRY

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Oct 12, 2007
CASE NO. 3:05CV189 (VLB) (D. Conn. Oct. 12, 2007)
Case details for

RHEA v. UHRY

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL BOON RHEA, Plaintiff, v. ALFRED UHRY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Connecticut

Date published: Oct 12, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 3:05CV189 (VLB) (D. Conn. Oct. 12, 2007)