From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhea v. Citibank, N.A.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 11, 2016
189 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–4252.

04-11-2016

Diane RHEA, Petitioner, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent.

Diane Rhea, pro se, Petitioner. Mairim A. Morales, Patrick A. Carey, and Brett A. Foster of Patrick A. Carey, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.


Diane Rhea, pro se, Petitioner.

Mairim A. Morales, Patrick A. Carey, and Brett A. Foster of Patrick A. Carey, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rhea v. Citibank, N.A.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 11, 2016
189 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Rhea v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:DIANE RHEA, Petitioner, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 11, 2016

Citations

189 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
2016 WL 1402846