From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R&G Enters. v. Soo Jeong Choi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 7, 2022
19 CIVIL 11699 (PAE)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2022)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 11699 (PAE)(SN)

10-07-2022

R&G ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SOO JEONG CHOI, et al., Defendants.


DEFAULT JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated October 7, 2022, the motion for default judgment is granted. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008); Small v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15,16 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam). The Court therefore declines to issue a certificate of appealability, and certifies that any appeal from the order would not be taken in in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

R&G Enters. v. Soo Jeong Choi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 7, 2022
19 CIVIL 11699 (PAE)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2022)
Case details for

R&G Enters. v. Soo Jeong Choi

Case Details

Full title:R&G ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SOO JEONG CHOI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 7, 2022

Citations

19 CIVIL 11699 (PAE)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2022)